"I wonder what happened the next day!" my friend commented after we discussed Matthew's parable over lunch. He is the owner of a successful business with approximately 140 hourly workers. I asked him two questions: Could you pay your employees as the landowner in the parable paid his workers? What do you think would happen at your business? He said he could pay his employees however he chose, but following the landowner's example would inevitably cause workplace problems. As for the next day? We wondered if many potential workers would show up early because they would want to work for a generous landowner or if all the workers would show up one hour before closing time. My friend honestly admitted that even as he tries to care for his laborers, he still has a responsibility to make a profit at the end of the day. The landowner's business model would not allow him to do that. However, he observed, "This story really isn't about good business practices and a fair payment structure, is it?" It's not. Our sense of fair play is offended here by the landowner's distribution of his assets, even though the people who worked all day received exactly what they had agreed to. Those workers remind me of the elder brother in the parable of the prodigal son (Luke 15:11-32). His complaint against his father ("I have been working like a slave for you … yet you killed the fatted calf for him.") sounds much like the laborers who worked all day ("We have borne the burden of the day and the scorching heat . . . yet you have made them equal to us."). Of course, the father's response to the elder brother ("Son, you are always with me, and all that is mine is yours") is similar in tone to the landowner's defense of his actions ("Am I not allowed to do what I choose with what belongs to me?"). ... You can read the rest of the commentary on our website.
Thanks to this week's contributor Philip Gladden. |
No comments:
Post a Comment