Sometimes, I delude myself into thinking I know the difference between the wheat and the weeds. This can happen in my own backyard. Some weeds are obvious, like the ever-present tumbleweeds and those horrible goatheads. When I see them pop up, I pull them out faster than you can say “An enemy has done this!” Other times, I’m not so sure. Are the volunteer bushes that spring up next to my door every year decorative bits of green offering relief from the desert brown, or are they opportunist pests leeching precious water that might otherwise nourish my few brave trees? Or how about the musk thistle? Those pink blossoms are beautiful and great for pollinators, but a sign at the local land trust identifies them as a highly invasive noxious weed. Jesus’ parable of the wheat and the tares asks a similar question: Who and what in the church are good, intentionally cultivated plants, and who and what are weeds? Perhaps more importantly, the parable also asks who gets to decide the difference. First things first: If you are teaching or preaching this passage, I encourage you to take some time to distinguish between the parable itself (vv. 24-30) and the allegorical explanation (vv. 36-43). Many scholars argue that this second part was likely concocted by Matthew as he tried to apply Jesus’ parable to the troublingly mixed state of the church in his day. While it may offer a satisfying apocalyptic ending (with a furnace of fire and gnashing of teeth!), it can also obscure the sense of what Jesus is trying to convey in the original parable. Because the problem is this: Everyone thinks they can tell the difference between the wheat and the weeds. .... Thank you to this week's writer, Ginna Bairby. Read the rest of the commentary at pres-outlook.org. |